DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS
701 S. COURTHOUSE ROAD, SUITE 1001
ARLINGTON, VA 22204-2490
BC
Docket No: 00287-14
1 May 2014
This is in reference to your application for correction of your
naval record pursuant to the provisions of title 10 of the
United States Code, section 1552.
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval
Records, sitting in executive session, considered your
application on 30 April 2014. Your allegations of error and
injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative
regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this
Board. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted
of your application, together with all material submitted in
support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes,
regulations, and policies.
After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire
record, the Board found the evidence submitted was insufficient
to establish the existence of probable material error or
injustice.
You enlisted in the Marine Corps on 1 November 2011. On 16
November 2011, you were referred for a mental health evaluation
due to suicidal ideation. You disclosed that you had attempted
suicide while attending the Army and Navy Academy because you
did not disclose on your in-processing paperwork. On 17
November 2011, you were diagnosed with adjustment disorder with
anxious mood and recommended for administrative separation. On
29 November 2011, you signed and acknowledged that you were
being administratively separated due to fraudulent entry based
on your failure to disclose vital mental health information
which existed prior to your enlistment. On 1 December 2011, you
were discharged with an uncharacterized entry level separation
by reason of fraudulent enlistment and assigned a reentry code
of RE-3F based on your disqualifying history of mental health
issues.
The Board noted that a waivable RE-3F is the most favorable
reentry code that may be assigned to individuals who are
separated by reason of fraudulent enlistment prior to completion
of initial entry training. The alternative is RE-4 (not
recommended for retention). As you were not eligible or
recommended for reenlistment, a code of RE-1 was not authorized.
Accordingly, your application has been denied. The names and
. votes of the members of the panel will be furnished upon
request.
It is regretted that the circumstances of your case are such
that favorable action cannot be taken. You are entitled to have
the Board reconsider its decision upon submission of new and
material evidence or other matter not previously considered by
the Board. In this regard, it is important to keep in mind that
a presumption of regularity attaches to all official records.
Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official
naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the
existence of probable material error or injustice.
Sincerely,
Sy SS fo
ROBERT D. SALMAN
Acting Executive Director
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR0431 14
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered our application on 14 May 2014. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes,. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official ‘Naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR0637 14
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 29 May 2014. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. Cénsequently, when applying for a correction of an official Yaval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR0694 14
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your ‘application on 4 June 2014. After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR8413 13
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 15 January 2014. As you have not demonstrated that it would be in the interest of justice to assign a more favorable reentry code as an exception to policy, the Board was unable to recommend favorable action on your request. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR7013 13
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 6 August 2014. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR0257 14
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 9 July 2014. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR8586 13
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 15 January 2014. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. Consequently, when applying tor a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2010 | 05249-10
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 23 March 2011. Your allegations of error and injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Board. You were diagnosed with a depressive disorder and recommended for an uncharacterized entry level separation.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2010 | 10211-10
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 28 June 2011. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your _naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR459-13
~ A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your . Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. On 14 August 2006 you were notified of administrative separation by reason of defective and fraudulent enlistment due to your failure to disclose pre-service history of...